Meaning of life ?
Last month, one of my friends asked me “Tell me what is the meaning of life”.
I first wrote a Mohan Lal dialogue
“ഉത്തരം ഇല്ല തമ്പുരാന്. ബുദ്ധനും ശങ്കരനും തേടിയത് ഇതേ ചോദ്യത്തിനുള്ള ഉത്തരം ആണ്. ആ ചോദ്യത്തിനുത്തരം കാണാനുള്ള നിയോഗം ആണ് തമ്പുരാന് ഓരോ മനുഷ്യ ജന്മവും…
But then I said, why not ?, may be I am past half my lifetime (probably even more) and there must be some part of the answer which I know already ?. So I sat down to write it down. Well here it is. I had articulated part of these in separate articles before, but for first time, in one location, Muralee’s take on meaning of life…
I perceive everything in the universe (both living and non living, real or virtual) as an entity with an identity. And every such “thing” (including me) is attached physically, legally, morally, emotionally, etc., to a few other “things”. And where each of these “things” stays is determined by how they are linked to the other “things”. I consider myself as one of these things, suspended in space, supported by enormous invisible attachments to other things (this includes my children, my parents, my friends, my colleagues, my job, my properties, and my Swiss bank account !!). At a given time, I am in an equilibrium supported by all these tentacles. Some of these links are stronger than others (I am more attached to my mother than to, say, my Facebook friends) and some of these relations are more unilateral than bilateral (I may be more attached to my friend than he is attached to me). The initial position where I stand, when I start to cognize my existence is a given (not my choice), but from that point I have the option to change that position. I can be attached to my parents (or not), I can be more attached to my friends more than my wife (or the other way round). I can be more attached to my job than my family. I can be more attached to my property than to my relatives. These are choices I make and that repositions me in the space with respect to others who are attached to me.
I could say I am a victim of circumstances, etc., but I think as a human being in democratic India I am free enough to make that choice for me and therefore I am fully responsible for where I find myself in this Universe.
These attachments, even though they are invisible and numerous, are very important, and as much as I control them, they control me too. This is why I go crazy when my investment in a stock becomes useless. This is why I become emotionally disturbed when my father dies or my dear one is taken away from me. However, I believe that how stable you will remain in your space or how easily you will re-accommodate to a new space is determined by how many linkages you have and how strong those linkages are. If you have cut off most of your strong attachments with your parents as you got married, a disturbance in your family will totally throw you off the tangent. If you neglected your family too much for the sake of work and then something goes wrong in your career, you are devastated. If you had maintained robust links and balanced relationships, you could have stayed stronger and moved onto new equilibriums without too many vibrations.
I am cognizant that while I am at the center of the Universe, as far as my networks and linkages are concerned, there is no center of the Universe. Barack Obama may feel that he is the center of the Universe due to all the power and influence he has on people and resources around him. But in my world view , Barack Obama’s driver is not a satellite of Obama revolving around BO. In the driver’s universe, he is at the center. He is attached to Obama, but also to his wife, to his children, his bicycle, his dog, his mother, and so on.
And, to me, this is the meaning and purpose of my life. If I were to look at the 6 billion people around me, the world doesn’t need me. The world will be fine with or without me. Much of the world doesn’t know I exist and won’t care if I cease to. But then there is a limited part of this Universe, which could be 10 to 1000 people, for whom my existence helps them stabilize their position in the Universe. My exit will upset them, and, in some cases, deeply so. Sure, they will get back on to another equilibrium, sometimes sooner than I fear they would, sometimes better than how I think they would. But in my thoughts, from where I stand, looking at where they stand, I feel that my continued existence is useful to them. That is the purpose of my life. If I were to be sent to space with all physical means of survival but emotionally cut off from everybody, then there would have been no meaning to my life. Then there would be no purpose of my existence.
To me, this theory is comprehensible and comprehensive enough to continue with my existence. For me, it works even if there was no God. I have often wondered whether God has a role to play in it. And yes, s/he has. We could take him/her as one of the (or the biggest) single influencing “thing” in our life. We can have an attachment to him which is stronger than what we have with our job, our property, and even our families. We can invest in that relationship and start to feel that the relationship is a two-way street that we derive energy from.. So when I am in trouble, with my family, with my job, wealth, health or property, I can still stay where I am because I have this big stabilizing factor in my life, that is GOD. In this scheme of things, the actual existence of God does not matter; just my belief that God is there and is offering me stability in times of turbulence is enough. I know this will work because while I do not believe in God, I get this type of solace and comfort from my father, who is dead and gone, who I know can offer me no practical assistance or advice. But the mere fact that I have known him, that I belong to him, that he loved me, and he is proud of me, all motivate me to live my life to the fullest and not throw it away into drinks (or other vices) when I am thrown off the tangent by a disturbance in my life.
Now, I know that this may not be the real meaning of life. I have this interesting analogy of a rat which fell into a sewer. Those of you who watched Ratatouille may recall a scene of our falling into a sewer and being carried by the sewage to the underground of Paris. Paris, like all big cities, has a complete network of sewers where there is an entire Universe and ecosystem. There may be animals (say rats) which once fell into it but never managed to get out. Within these tunnels, they may reproduce and a few generations later, there could be a set of rats who never have seen world above it and only knew darkness, the stink, the flow of sewage, etc. If one of those rats were to be intelligent, it can create a worldview which is self contained within that network of sewers. Such a worldview will be both comprehensible and self contained. It will have no role for sunlight, it will not include any reference to the life above it, there will be no trees, no human beings, no Eiffel Tower, nothing. Such a theory will be enough for the rat to get on with its life. That does not mean that there is no life outside the sewer or Eiffel Tower is not a reality. Not sure if some of you are still following me here. What I am saying is that the fact that I have a worldview and it allows me to get on with my life, does not mean that is THE view of the world. There are many possible, self contained, logical worldviews that are available.
Now, to be honest as long as I am thinking, I cannot be happy with my worldview, till the time I know that is THE world view. But this I don’t know yet. But I know that there is no other better worldview I have come across. I have studied the major religions, which offer alternative worldviews that satisfy the curiosity of billions of people, giving them guidance and peace of mind. But to my logical mind, none of those worldviews survive my scrutiny, not even in the first reading. To use the rat in the sewer analogy again, while I am in dark surrounded by you know what, I find pretty much others being in the same condition. What I really want is somebody who can either push the manhole cover (manhole = big entry point into the sewer from the ground) from inside OR somebody from outside who will open the manhole cover. Once that is done, light comes in and I know for sure there is a world outside. If I am lucky, I may even be able to get out and experience another world. However, I am not seeing either of this happening.
And this is my primary complaint about God, if one exists. Hindu religion teaches as “Aham Brahmasmy” (that I am part of the same God). And this is my main complaint about God. It is so hard for me to get to him but is so easy for him to get to me. My situation is like that of Mammooty in “Katha Parayumbol”. He suspects that Balan exists somewhere out there, but among the multitudes of humanity, there is no way one could be searched out. But for Balan, it was easy, he knew the Superstar existed and would have sought him out.
I was in Haiti and was having this very enjoyable discussion with Claudia, who is also an environmental expert, currently in the US, but originally from South America. As you know, people in South America are also spiritual and religious like us in India. But Claudia also, like me, had moved away from religion. She said, ever since 15 she hadn’t prayed to God and no longer acknowledged his existence. A couple of years back, she was caught out, while surfing, in the sea beyond the surf line. The weather was bad and she could not get back. Nor could her colleagues help her. She was on the waters, with her surfing board, and one big wave, she was finished. At that time she thought “Shall I pray to God now?” and decided “may be that is not fair, after leaving him for 30 years, now I can’t go back to him when I am in a mess”.
I told her that if I was in such a situation, I would have no hesitation in praying. Firstly, as a materialist, I have nothing to lose from it. Holding onto my ideological dogma gives me nothing in the final moments of my life. But more importantly, my conception of God is lot more holistic. I do not see God as a mean person who, if he hears me praying from near the mouth of death, or from the other side of the surf line, he will look into his little account book and say “that guy Muralee has ignored me for last 40 years, now is my time to square up”. My image of God is much bigger than that. To me, God is that person, who will use exactly that moment to come to my rescue and say “Muralee, I have been missing you all this long and thank God you have found me now”.
So, as much as I use my brain to comprehend the world around me and meaning of my life, for the time being I take no cognizance of God in any shape or form. If I am indeed “brahmam”, I leave it to the bigger brahman (parabrahmam) who has better resources under his control, to seek me out.